| Suppliers plan to pass buck on carbon |
 |
 |
 |
| Fossil Fuels - Oil |
| Monday, 25 August 2008 11:55 |
|
Sydney Morning Herald Thursday 7/8/2008 Page: 3 THE electricity industry is planning to pass on most of the costs of carbon trading to the public, even though it is set to receive taxpayer compensation from the Federal Government, documents seen by the Herald show. The move to fix a carbon price into some future energy contracts signals the industry intends to do what many opponents of compensation feared: accept any cash compensation and free carbon permits, but raise prices anyway. A clause saying a "carbon adjustment" would be added to fixed prices in new energy contracts was discussed at a meeting of the Australian Financial Markets Association, minutes of a meeting held in December show. A business customer negotiating a contract for future electricity supply, who asked to remain anonymous, said the electricity supplier had insisted on a "pass through" clause, which would send carbon costs directly down the line to consumers. "A large amount of cash is going to be given to the coal-fired sector under the Rudd Government"s green paper, yet there will be no discount to consumers," said Jeff Angel, the director of the Total Environment Centre, which obtained the documents. "There"s a simple way out of this - don"t give the coal-fired generators any subsidies." In the discussion paper it released last month, the Federal Government proposed providing financial help to some power generators once carbon trading comes into force, to lower the risk of scaring off investors. "In addition, every cent raised from the carbon pollution reduction scheme will be used to help Australians - households and businesses - adjust to the scheme and to invest in clean energy options," said a spokeswoman for the Minister for Climate Change, Penny Wong. "The point of the green paper is to generate discussion. .. and we welcome feedback on it from business and the community." Some economists have joined environmental groups to argue that compensating high polluting power generators could undermine an emissions trading scheme, by removing incentives to invest in renewable energy. Most household electricity bills are protected from huge rises by price caps set by state governments, though the energy industry is lobbying to remove the caps. The main NSW power generators, Delta Energy, Eraring Energy and Macquarie Generation, referred inquiries about passing on carbon costs to the industry body, the Energy Supply Association of Australia. It said the costs of carbon trading would inevitably be passed on to some extent, but that a competitive marketplace would protect consumers. "It wouldn"t surprise me if it was being written into contracts now," said the association"s chief executive, Brad Page. "At the moment there"s a period of extreme uncertainty until we have a sense of what the carbon price will be." The compensation proposed in the discussion paper was aimed at helping generators survive the introduction of carbon trading, but they would still have to buy emission permits to cover their generation, the cost of which they were unlikely to fully pass on to consumers, Mr Page said. "The issue is not about how you keep these generators operating by sheltering them from the carbon price. The issue is how you financially support their transition so that Australia protects its reputation as a safe investment destination." |
Checking the BaselineTo the relief of the residents of New Orleans and the entire Gulf Coast, Hurricane Gustav has been much less destructive than Katrina. Although the region"s oil & gas infrastructure appears largely intact, it"s a bit too soon to assess... Read more Oil | | TUSEDAY, 2 September 2008 |
Oil Search, Exxon lead gas race with $2.5bn PNG deal While the PNG to Australia gas pipeline project failed because of all the coal seam gas that has been discovered onshore in Oz, the joint venturers in New Guinea are making progress on exporting the gas in the form of... Read more Oil | | Friday, 26 June 2009 |
fossil fuels killing the environment Fossil fuels work with natural gas, coal and oil? Just one tank of gasoline can take one car hundreds of miles away, but once you start the engine, than the natural gas will pollute the environment.We use fossil fuels to... Read more Oil | John | Thursday, 24 January 2008 |
Why do they call it Fossil Fuels? Why do they call it fossil fuels ?Did you know that creatures millions of years ago are used in daily use? Did you also know that they power your house? Well if you are saying “Yeah right,” then please read... Read more Oil | | Januaryonday, 21 January 2008 |
When Is Cheaper Oil Bad?Talk about a reversal of fortunes. A mere two months since oil was flirting with $150 per barrel, OPEC is considering production cuts to defend a $100 price floor and reputable journals are suggesting that $80 could soon be in... Read more Oil | | Septemberonday, 8 September 2008 |
China Slowing Down, Oil Price FallingMish Shedlock points to a Bloomberg article reporting that the Chinese manufacturing sector may actually be contracting - China"s Manufacturing Contracts for Second Month. Mish notes that this may be just as much a factor in the falling oil price... Read more Oil | | Wednesday, 3 September 2008 |
Leaving fossil fuels in the ground vs. using them all up now I wrote a think piece for Worldchanging playing off one of the basic arguments against climate mitigation (we"ll be richer in the future and more capable of dealing with any effects) with the idea of leaving fossil fuels in the... Read more Oil | | Wednesday, 16 April 2008 |
Iceland Flirts With the Dark Side Tyler at Clean Break reports that clean energy poster-child Iceland is going to allow exploratory oil drilling in the country - Iceland sends mixed signals, goes to the dark side.Okay, now I’m discouraged. If there was one place on the... Read more Oil | | Thursday, 4 September 2008 |
|
More in: Oil |
|
100% - + 8Show options | |
