| Missing the Boat |
|
|
|
| Fossil Fuels - Oil |
| Friday, 19 September 2008 02:53 |
|
When I consider what happened in the House of Representatives this week, passing a "drilling bill" that appears highly unlikely to stimulate more exploration and production--and might actually result in less--I look at two factors. Aside from the influence of those for whom the very idea of oil & gas drilling represents an affront to their sensibilities, I see a fundamental misunderstanding among many in Congress of the relative contribution of different energy sources and our structural requirements for them. More importantly, the nation still lacks a coherent energy strategy, which would serve as a guide to the tactics we should pursue. Absent such a plan, the result could hardly be anything but the grab-bag of discrete measures we observe. Without the least bit of condescension, we should recognize that it isn"t easy to compare different forms of energy, or to assess the remaining resource potential of the US. It takes a pretty solid background in science or engineering to be able to put barrels, BTUs, cubic feet, megawatts, and kilowatt-hours onto a consistent energy basis, and that still ignores the effective firewalls between the chemical-fuel economy and the electrical economy, with all their nuances. Few of our elected representatives have that background or experience, and as busy as they are with the numerous problems before them, there is a natural tendency to latch onto handy soundbites, such as the oft-repeated factoid that the US consumes 25% of the world"s oil while possessing only 3% of global oil reserves. Unfortunately, this reasonably accurate comparison turns out to be entirely meaningless, because it ignores three much more relevant factors:
In effect, then, our current strategy for future US oil production rests on the interpretation of a marginally-relevant, though satisfyingly-pithy statistic as a verdict of futility. The result is a "drilling bill" that would ensure that drilling can"t contribute to reducing US oil imports, by opening up only a fraction of the off-limits portions of our Outer Continental Shelf--and only the most technically-challenging ones, at that--while imposing a permanent drilling ban on everything within 50 miles of the coast, aside from the heavily-explored Western and Central Gulf of Mexico. This is like putting half your net worth into a safe deposit box and then throwing the keys into the ocean. For a hint of what a real energy strategy might look like, you have only to read yesterday"s Washington Post op-ed by Henry Kissinger and Martin Feldstein. They suggest a coordinated response by the large oil-consuming countries to our own out-of-control demand growth and to OPEC"s manipulation of the global oil market. Among other things, Drs. Feldstein and Kissinger recognize that opportunities to displace oil with other energy sources are greatest where oil is used to produce heat and electricity, rather than transportation energy and chemicals. While it"s not quite an energy strategy in itself, their short essay could provide the guiding principles for an energy bill that would address the economic and geopolitical dimensions of this energy crisis, rather than merely creating the appearance of action prior to a critical election. |
Checking the BaselineTo the relief of the residents of New Orleans and the entire Gulf Coast, Hurricane Gustav has been much less destructive than Katrina. Although the region"s oil & gas infrastructure appears largely intact, it"s a bit too soon to assess... Read more Oil | | TUSEDAY, 2 September 2008 |
Oil Search, Exxon lead gas race with $2.5bn PNG dealWhile the PNG to Australia gas pipeline project failed because of all the coal seam gas that has been discovered onshore in Oz, the joint venturers in New Guinea are making progress on exporting the gas in the form of... Read more Oil | | Friday, 26 June 2009 |
fossil fuels killing the environment![]() Fossil fuels work with natural gas, coal and oil? Just one tank of gasoline can take one car hundreds of miles away, but once you start the engine, than the natural gas will pollute the environment.We use fossil fuels to... Read more Oil | John | Thursday, 24 January 2008 |
Why do they call it Fossil Fuels?![]() Why do they call it fossil fuels ?Did you know that creatures millions of years ago are used in daily use? Did you also know that they power your house? Well if you are saying “Yeah right,” then please read... Read more Oil | | Januaryonday, 21 January 2008 |
When Is Cheaper Oil Bad?Talk about a reversal of fortunes. A mere two months since oil was flirting with $150 per barrel, OPEC is considering production cuts to defend a $100 price floor and reputable journals are suggesting that $80 could soon be in... Read more Oil | | Septemberonday, 8 September 2008 |
China Slowing Down, Oil Price FallingMish Shedlock points to a Bloomberg article reporting that the Chinese manufacturing sector may actually be contracting - China"s Manufacturing Contracts for Second Month. Mish notes that this may be just as much a factor in the falling oil price... Read more Oil | | Wednesday, 3 September 2008 |
Leaving fossil fuels in the ground vs. using them all up nowI wrote a think piece for Worldchanging playing off one of the basic arguments against climate mitigation (we"ll be richer in the future and more capable of dealing with any effects) with the idea of leaving fossil fuels in the... Read more Oil | | Wednesday, 16 April 2008 |
Iceland Flirts With the Dark Side![]() Tyler at Clean Break reports that clean energy poster-child Iceland is going to allow exploratory oil drilling in the country - Iceland sends mixed signals, goes to the dark side.Okay, now I’m discouraged. If there was one place on the... Read more Oil | | Thursday, 4 September 2008 |
|
More in: Oil |
|
100% - + 8Show options | |








