| Reliance on coal could scuttle us |
 |
 |
 |
| Fossil Fuels - Coal |
| Monday, 11 August 2008 11:54 |
|
Age Friday 18/7/2008 Page: 13 It would be shortsighted of Australia to rely on coal and not other energy sources. THE Rudd Government"s green paper on a "carbon pollution reduction scheme", and the methods to achieve this reduction, have some strongly innovative elements. But there is a continued emphasis on investment in offsets and abatement from large-scale carbon capture projects to significantly extend the life of our coal industry. This poses three huge risks to the Australian economy. Are we sure that we want our children to shoulder them? The first big risk is that carbon capture and storage isn"t proven. Experts believe it may take until 2015 or later to prove the technology, if then. The second big risk is that it may not prove cost effective. Evidence is accumulating that carbon capture and storage may prove uneconomic because renewables such as solar, geothermal power and wind are falling in price very rapidly. But the biggest argument of all for caution - yet hardly ever spoken - is that there simply may not be enough coal to go around. This could lead to global shortages, price spikes, economic disruption and a rush to other energy sources - meaning billions of dollars of stranded investments. Incredibly for an energy resource that the world depends on, global coal statistics are shockingly poor. Take China. Since 1992, the nation has mined roughly 20% of its reported reserves. Yet, China hasn"t changed its reported reserve figures since that year. The United States and Australia have reasonably credible reserves, but other nations with large reported coal assets are Russia, India and South Africa. How reliable are their figures? Put bluntly, neither the world nor Australia should commit to carbon capture and storage until there is a better global accounting of the underlying energy resource. This matters. The world, led by China, is rapidly consuming coal. China is now a net importer of coal despite being the world"s largest coal producer. What would happen to all those new Chinese coal-fired power stations (now opening at the rate of one a week) if domestic reserves turn out to be inadequate to meet demand? One outcome could be a scramble for coal resources at any price. That, in turn, could mean a queue of coal ships off Newcastle in NSW of 100 ships, or maybe 200 instead of 50 to 60 now. It could mean blackouts and brownouts in China with huge implications for global supply chains. If an energy crunch induced by a coal shortage happened in China, there could be a global contractionary contagion effect, similar to that which the world is seeing as a result of American subprime mortgages, except potentially much bigger. One response to such a risk would be to bet on the "Lucky Country" scenario, in which Australia would be blissfully unaffected by this international energy turmoil, because it has large coal supplies relative to domestic consumption. That may be true. But Australia operates in a global market. If bad global coal reserve figures lead to inadequate future capacity planning, which then leads to global shortages, resultant price spikes may bring short-teen windfall gains in Australia"s terms of trade. But it will do so at the risk of worsening global economic short term pain and would probably drive coal prices so high that other countries - unable to source adequate coal at any price - turn to quick-to-construct renewable energy resources such as wind, wave, solar and geothermal power. And we are left behind. In the end, the global economy will adapt. The question is how fast, how smartly, and with how much pain. It would be far smarter to spend the next few years expanding Australia"s real, proven and commercially operating renewable energy sources such as wind, solar and geothermal power. This is a key element that the Government and Ross Garnaut must be thinking harder about driving forward. The time to think about carbon capture and storage will be when the underlying reserve is proven and credible and certain to be around for long enough to justify the investment. That certainty isn"t there right now. Barry Brook is Sir Hubert Wilkins professor of climate change and director of the Research Institute for Climate Change and Sustainability at the University of Adelaide. |
Recycling Waste Heat Via CogenerationSolve Climate has an interesting post on cogeneration in the US and the - Co-Generation: Clean as Wind, Reliable as Coal. The title isn"t strictly true - while it can improve the efficiency of many forms of power generation, CHP... Read more Coal | | Saturday, 13 September 2008 |
Clean Loy Yang costs huge Herald SunWednesday 27/8/2008 Page: 62THE boss of one of Victoria"s biggest power plants says it will be "very, very tough" for the state"s brown coal-fired electricity generators to cut carbon output by 20 per cent by 2020 to meet Rudd... Read more Coal | | Thursday, 11 September 2008 |
Hawaii Swaps Coal Power Plant for Biomass Power plants swapping their coal for renewable fuel sources seems to be a growing trend, and Hawaii looks to add this idea to the host of other sustainable practices the state has been implementing. Hawaii has just finished a... Read more Coal | | TUSEDAY, 2 September 2008 |
Our coal emissions are worstHerald SunFriday 29/8/2008 Page: 7AUSTRALIANS continue to lead the world on creating emissions from burning coal, pumping the equivalent of 10 tonnes of carbon dioxide a year per person, a global study has shown. The Centre for Global Development, a... Read more Coal | | Septemberonday, 15 September 2008 |
Coal To Plastic In ChinaMy recent post on bioplastics had one commenter at TOD noting that China is looking at producing plastic from coal (and that Pakistan claims to have the world"s 4th largest coal reserves).Given China"s interest in coal to liquids I thought... Read more Coal | | Septemberonday, 1 September 2008 |
A huge bet on coal seam gasBG"s drawn out takeover attempt for Origin Energy has finally bitten the dust, with Origin instead selling a large stake in its coal seam methane (coal seam gas) assets to Conoco Phillips, with the gas destined for a large LNG... Read more Coal | | Wednesday, 10 September 2008 |
Coal-fired stations too risky, says AGLSydney Morning HeraldThursday 21/8/2008 Page: 4ONE OF the country"s largest electricity suppliers has said buying the state"s coal-fired stations ranks as a low priority because of the financial risks of carbon emissions trading. The managing director of AGL Energy, Michael... Read more Coal | | TUSEDAY, 9 September 2008 |
Reliance on coal could scuttle usAgeFriday 18/7/2008 Page: 13It would be shortsighted of Australia to rely on coal and not other energy sources.THE Rudd Government"s green paper on a "carbon pollution reduction scheme", and the methods to achieve this reduction, have some strongly innovative elements.... Read more Coal | | Augustonday, 11 August 2008 |
|
More in: Coal |
|
100% - + 8Show options | |
